by John L. Allen Jr.
A recent Vatican clampdown on a small but influential Catholic group in Latin America and Spain illustrates perhaps the most striking contrast between the papacies of John Paul II and Benedict XVI when it comes to internal church governance: a firmer line regarding the “new movements” under Benedict.
To be sure, it’s not that Benedict opposes the movements, a constellation of new lay groups and religious orders founded in the 20th century and known both for loyalty to Rome and success in attracting vocations, especially among the young. On the contrary, the pope has made his broad support clear: Consecrated women associated with Communion and Liberation, one of these movements, staff his personal household, and Benedict tapped members of the Legionaries of Christ to serve his recent Christmas midnight Mass. So far, Benedict has also named as bishops six members of Opus Dei, commonly numbered among the movements though it is technically a “personal prelature.”
During the John Paul years critics sometimes groused that the Vatican was overly indulgent with the movements, looking the other way at charges of misconduct or violations of church discipline. By way of contrast, Benedict has shown a greater willingness to demand that the movements play by the same rules as more established Catholic orders and lay groups.
Most observers say that Benedict has not sought out occasions to rein in the movements, but rather has been more disposed than his predecessor to take action on a case-by-case basis as problems arise.
The most recent example has come with Lumen Dei (the “Light of God”), a body of priests, consecrated women and married laity founded in 1967 in Cusco, Peru, by a Spanish-born Jesuit named Fr. Rodrigo Molina, who died in 2002. It currently numbers some 650 members in 71 dioceses, principally in Spain and Latin America.
Dedicated to service of the poor, Lumen Dei is also known for a deeply traditional spirituality, including a regime of physical discipline for members, including sleeping on wooden boards, a limited and deliberately bland diet, and punishments such as kneeling on objects designed to inflict pain. Lumen Dei operates roughly 20 schools both in Spain and in some Latin American countries.
In recent years, a few members of Lumen Dei have complained about various alleged irregularities, including financial mismanagement, abuses of authority and even sexual abuse. Although an inquest by the Vatican’s Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life apparently did not establish specific acts of wrongdoing, the congregation nonetheless decided in May to depose the group’s leadership, citing internal “division and confusion.”
Retired Archbishop Fernando Sebastián Aguilar of Pamplona, Spain, a Claretian with no previous ties to Lumen Dei, was imposed as the group’s interim superior, with the title of “papal commissioner.” Sources told NCR that Sebastián’s mandate is to help Lumen Dei come up with an internal constitution acceptable to the Vatican, and to groom a new leadership team willing to implement it.
In response, members of Lumen Dei filed an appeal with the Apostolic Signatura, the Vatican’s Supreme Court, seeking to block the appointment. In September, the Signatura rejected that request, in one of the first decisions signed by the court’s new prefect -- Archbishop Raymond Burke, former archbishop of St. Louis. (The decree did not address the substance of the members’ complaint, but rather refused to suspend the appointment of a papal commissioner.)
In mid-December, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican’s secretary of state, wrote to members of Lumen Dei instructing that each member write to Sebastián to indicate submission or “look somewhere else” for their spiritual path. Sebastián has set a deadline of Jan. 24 for those letters to arrive at the group’s Madrid headquarters.
The crackdown on Lumen Dei is the latest example of growing Vatican willingness to take action against the new movements. Other instances include:
Speaking on background, a senior Vatican official said that the effort under Benedict XVI appears to be to commend the zeal of the new movements, but also to insist that they “mature,” accepting the authority of the pope and the bishops and following the established laws of the church.
That effort may be setting a pattern for church officials at other levels. Last June, for example, Archbishop Edwin O’Brien of Baltimore issued a ruling demanding greater transparency from the Legionaries of Christ and their lay arm, Regnum Christi, and barring them from one-on-one spiritual counseling with anyone under 18.
At the time, O’Brien said that while the Legionaries and Regnum Christi “do a lot of good work,” he also cited an “endemic” sense of secrecy that in his view needed to change.
John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. His e-mail address is jallen@ncronline.org.
National Catholic Reporter January 9, 2009
