Trump hires down, way down

When you learned Tulsi Gabbard had been nominated to be director of national intelligence didn't you wonder what intelligence our allies will now fail to share with us? She served on the Armed Services Committee for much of her time in Congress and did two terms on the Foreign Affairs Committee, but has no background in intelligence oversight.

The job to which Gabbard aspires requires collating and evaluating intelligence reports from the nation's different intelligence gathering agencies. Will Gabbard know how to spot weak evidence? Will she intuit when something is so dangerous the president must be informed? Or will she tailor her assessments so that she tells the president what he wants to hear? That is a recipe for danger.

Robert Kennedy Jr. has never met a conspiracy theory he didn't like. The pandemic spawned many such theories, but Kennedy's affinity for disinformation predates COVID. Vaccines have downsides because everything good has a downside. That is human nature. Vaccines still save lives year in and year out and any attempt to restrict them will have dreadful consequences.

I am as suspicious of creeping scientism as anyone else: In our culture, people cloak non-scientific claims in the authority of science all the time, with negative, consequent distortions. Think of Charles Murray's The Bell Curve or virtually everything Steven Pinker has written. But I want to get every vaccine my doctor recommends. Besides, my complaints about scientism apply to Kennedy also: He likes to dress his nonsense in pseudo-scientific academic jargon, too.

Perhaps the most worrying nomination is that of Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a planned new Department of Government Efficiency. There is no doubt Musk is a genius and Ramaswamy is really bright. But one of the conceits that predates Trumpism is the idea that we need a businessperson to clean up the government.

Running a business and running the government are vastly different tasks. The purpose of government is to serve the common good and that may require things that are inherently inefficient. Trump knows better than most Americans just how cumbersome our constitutional protections are when it comes to criminal justice! Enforcing the Bill of Rights is an exercise in the promotion of justice, not efficiency. A successful foreign policy might entail a host of inefficiencies if it is to succeed: Entrepreneurship is different from diplomacy.

Yes, the incoming Cabinet looks like a clown car. Yes, some appointments are more scary than others. Yes, there is a perverse hope that the inexperience of some of these nominees may result in their being ineffectual.

The American people voted to throw the establishment out and Trump is doing that. A lot of needed expertise and wisdom will get tossed out as well. Electoral politics is performative but the politics of governance requires more and different skills. With these nominations, you don't have to look very far down the tracks to see some trainwrecks ahead.